Skip to main content

India should be Reorganized into Smaller States.

The recent gimmick of dividing India's largest state, U.P., into 4 parts though just political drama for cheap electoral gains but still is food for some thought. I am not capable enough to judge the political implications of the divide but would like to analyse how good it is for the people of the country.

To begin with the facts, among the worst of our states is UP, Bihar, MP while the best are Kerala, Haryana, Punjab. One of the major hurdles for these states apart from being poorly governed is the sheer size. For any entity managing such diverse and heavely populated land is a big challenge.

The only reason of making India a federal state, was to break this vast, diverse land into smaller managable units. To achive this goal we need to divide it into much smaller entities if we feel that it's impossible to govern it efficiently at current scale. There is a lack of uniformity in the way our population is divided. Some states such as Goa, Manipur, Mizoram or Sikkim are one-tenths of U.P.'s population.

Thus the task of a single person ruling over U.P. is so much different and difficult than the one ruling over Sikkim or Goa. Corporate enterprises who manage corporations with huge number of employees with diverse ethinicity and geographies, have enumerated that efficient management requires breaking up into smaller verticals. If we learn from there we'll realise that smaller states will ensure better management.

But the biggest hurdle amongst all would not be social or economical but Political. Politicians are concerned about their prowess. They are unwilling to give up a part of their kingdom. People, however, are skeptical because they are confused with so many identities of self. We are not living under one identity of being Indian but of being a UPite, Delhite or the likes. It's because of this association with the identity that we are unwilling to commit.

But mostly, as seen in case of Telangana, it's lack of political will to commit to people's benefit that supercedes decision-making. I could garner no other rational social reasoning for the decision. I believe there is scope and need for further division, not meaning that every state should be the size Goa or Sikkim. If someone has some valid reasons of opposition, do enlighten me.

"Federalism is not only good politics but also good economics.”

Comments

  1. as u said very well about breaking will manage things better, i say breaking will not ensure a good management every time ,point is to achieve better management to fulfill people needs. i think this kindly enlighten me more on this , but very well articulated article

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

He who knows how to be Poor knows Everything

In today's materialistic world, being poor is the worst thing that can happen to you. Being educated, being moralistic and being principled amount to almost nothing if you are poor. There are no opportunities to come out of that quagmire. Someone who has been through this and has somehow overcome the mountain of difficulties, would possess incredible amounts of determination, will and belief in his ability. Such talent is rare but often results in producing the greats. Being poor teaches you time management, how to make the most of your time to survive. It teaches you adaptability, how to adjust to the extremes of living conditions. It pushes you to extend your boundries and grow farther. It makes you emotionally and mentally strong. Someone who has been facing defeat after defeat but still gets up everytime to face adds so many facets to his personality. You learn only from your mistakes. If you have never faced defeat, it would be hard to survive. To relate to my own l

Belief in Virtue is more important than Virtue itself

Just pause for a second from your daily life. The life that you are so desperately trying to organise, to make worthy, to make grand. The future plans that you are putting together, the aspiration and the fantasies; put them aside and think about this- "We spend a lot of time trying to organize the world, we build clocks and calendars and we try to predict the weather but what part of our life is truly under our control. What if we choose to exist purely in our reality of our own making, does that render us insane. If that does, isn't that better than a life of despair?" Rationality and irrationality is purely subjective. Also what's better is only a matter of how deeply you apply your thoughts to it. If being happy and content is all that you want in life, then isn't living an insane life in a world of your own, the perfect thing for you. The problem with us is that we don't know what we actually want, and when we do, we hate to accept them and instead

India has the largest pool of talented manpower but very few innovations and patented products.

Ancient India was the hub of learning and innovation. India had scholars like Aryabhatta, Charak, Chanakya, and many others. But, with time, that zeal for innovation has faded away due to the constant lack of encouragement from the whole system. Ancient India gave zero to the world, invented chess, developed ayurveda but today not many discoveries take place in India. This lack of innovation is the result of the systemic failure of our society. From school to college to workplace, we are taught and tamed into following the set rules. We are taught to be followers and any attempt to think freely is viewed as dissent. Our society has closed itself to any criticism or corrective evolution. This was quite evident when we saw the introduction of Genetically Modified seeds in India. Every technology has its pros and cons, and we need to encourage the spirit of research and innovation to increase the pros and limit the cons but an outright opposition to anything new will be a hindrance